Check out sceptics blogs, they are getting very emotional about the fall of their great leader.

March 16, 2010
By

super hero Sceptics seem to get rather upset with anyone who criticise the pope of Scepticism the infallible professor Ezard Ernst  I have never met Edzard Ernst, however I can say with confidence he has very little understand of what goes on in my practice. Because  I do not find professor Ernst a “sweet and mild mannered German teddy bear of a man”, it does not follow, I hate him with a passion” which apparently make me “look even uglier” than I am without hair.  Ernst is probably a typical academic who will never play outside the minor leagues, and if it was not for Simon Singh few outside the blog community  would have ever heard of him.

 

Below is what “Scepticat” has to say

Edzard Ernst, Professor of Complementary Medicine, has always struck me as a sweet and mild-mannered German teddy bear of a man, yet the quacks hate him with a passion that makes them look even uglier than they are already. It’s no longer a surprise to me that quacks ignore the science and prefer instead to vilify their critics – they don’t have many proper arguments, after all. But it was a bit of surprise that someone sent me a link to a post on the ironically named ‘Truth Will Out’ blog entitled, Edzard Ernst is a fake-3. As that post is a particularly vacuous attempt at character assassination, I assume it was sent to me so I could give it the treatment it deserves.

The writer is one Chris Holmes, a hypnotherapist and author of a self-published book about nicotine. Edzard evidently winds Chris up so much that he spent some 2,000 words (and that just on part 3) huffing with resentment and pushing a monstrously fallacious argument, which amounts to this:

P1. To be a professor, you must be a “qualified expert”;
P2. To be a qualified expert you must have professional experience as a practitioner; To read on Scepticats Blog

This explains where the expression “Those that cant do:  teach”! must come from.

Related posts:

  1. Vacancy for a former medical doctor who did a bit of Woo on the side.
  2. GCC Fiddles While Edzard Ernst Burns
  3. The chiropractic profession has not been very effective at defending itself from sceptics
  4. Edzard Ernst Presents his views to the GCC
  5. Incompetent leadership unable to put Ernst down.
  6. Sceptics are making complaints
  7. Nice guidelines for back pain draw criticism from sceptics
  8. Subluxation Chiropractors must make sure there is not a grain of truth in allegations being made by sceptics
  9. Chiropractor Damien O Dwyer says this is a great opportunity to claim cultural authority
  10. GCC sceptics redefining Chiropractic in the UK.

Tags: ,

My Tweets

  • richardlanigan @Blue_Wode I see you have been busy last few days,Guardian, Telegraph, I make a living from chiropractic & dont spend as much time on it asU Time ago 3 Days
  • @Blue_Wode movement is vital for wellbeing how people get their bodies moving is up to them.Some people dont like exercise,its not risk free Time ago 3 Days
  • RT @DrEvanHarris: @bengoldacre after all if we criticise a cleric/journalist 4 their views - & we do - we wld reject complnts of being abusive/insulting, no? Time ago 5 Days
  • Isabelle plantation Richmond park one of most beautiful places in May t.co/5QXVXBYv Time ago 5 Days
  • @bengoldacre RCTs suggest that an average person should respond in an average way to an intervention. Tail of bell curve for clinicians Time ago 6 Days
  • @Blue_Wode @Oscap_ @youtube Thats photoshop Time ago 6 Days
  • @Blue_Wode some do (catholics) and you believe chiropractors use a form of faith healing, some do, majority dont, we use anatomy &physiology Time ago 7 Days
  • @Blue_Wode fair enough, lots of christian MDs,surely believing, loving god will get you into heaven, is more odd than anything I believe in Time ago 7 Days
  • @Blue_Wode thats like me making judgement about you because "skepticalhealh" made idiotic comments to me. Time ago 8 Days
  • @Blue_Wode I focus on correcting spinal dysfunction and if they have medical conditions, I send them to their GPs for medical treatment Time ago 8 Days
  • @Blue_Wode well taught at AECC, would love to compare my knowledge of differential diagnosis for spinal conditions with any medical doc Time ago 8 Days
  • @Blue_Wode This is the point I am making to you, pathology and differential diagnosis are for the practice of medicine not chiropractic Time ago 8 Days
  • @Blue_Wode the S word is not used at AECC, a very medicalised education,which I strongly opposed,however compares favourably with med school Time ago 8 Days
  • @Blue_Wode something for your website my tutors in these subjects all had medical backgrounds t.co/sw5Tgsh4 Time ago 8 Days
  • @bengoldacre @SLSingh shows how little you know about chiropractic profession& politics in general if you think Joe Blogs hs much influence Time ago 8 Days
  • Powered by: Web Design Company

Follow @richardlanigan on twitter.

Topics related to the Art, Science, Philosophy & Promotion of Chiropractic

SafeSubscribe with Constant Contact
For Email Newsletters you can trust
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: