Check out sceptics blogs, they are getting very emotional about the fall of their great leader.

March 16, 2010
By Richard Lanigan

super hero Sceptics seem to get rather upset with anyone who criticise the pope of Scepticism the infallible professor Ezard Ernst  I have never met Edzard Ernst, however I can say with confidence he has very little understand of what goes on in my practice. Because  I do not find professor Ernst a “sweet and mild mannered German teddy bear of a man”, it does not follow, I hate him with a passion” which apparently make me “look even uglier” than I am without hair.  Ernst is probably a typical academic who will never play outside the minor leagues, and if it was not for Simon Singh few outside the blog community  would have ever heard of him.

 

Below is what “Scepticat” has to say

Edzard Ernst, Professor of Complementary Medicine, has always struck me as a sweet and mild-mannered German teddy bear of a man, yet the quacks hate him with a passion that makes them look even uglier than they are already. It’s no longer a surprise to me that quacks ignore the science and prefer instead to vilify their critics – they don’t have many proper arguments, after all. But it was a bit of surprise that someone sent me a link to a post on the ironically named ‘Truth Will Out’ blog entitled, Edzard Ernst is a fake-3. As that post is a particularly vacuous attempt at character assassination, I assume it was sent to me so I could give it the treatment it deserves.

The writer is one Chris Holmes, a hypnotherapist and author of a self-published book about nicotine. Edzard evidently winds Chris up so much that he spent some 2,000 words (and that just on part 3) huffing with resentment and pushing a monstrously fallacious argument, which amounts to this:

P1. To be a professor, you must be a “qualified expert”;
P2. To be a qualified expert you must have professional experience as a practitioner; To read on Scepticats Blog

This explains where the expression “Those that cant do:  teach”! must come from.

Related posts:

  1. Vacancy for a former medical doctor who did a bit of Woo on the side.
  2. GCC Fiddles While Edzard Ernst Burns
  3. Sceptics are making complaints
  4. The chiropractic profession has not been very effective at defending itself from sceptics
  5. Edzard Ernst Presents his views to the GCC
  6. Incompetent leadership unable to put Ernst down.
  7. GCC sceptics redefining Chiropractic in the UK.
  8. Nice guidelines for back pain draw criticism from sceptics
  9. Chiropractor Damien O Dwyer says this is a great opportunity to claim cultural authority
  10. Subluxation Chiropractors must make sure there is not a grain of truth in allegations being made by sceptics

Tags: ,

Topics related to the Art, Science, Philosophy & Promotion of Chiropractic

SafeSubscribe with Constant Contact
For Email Newsletters you can trust

Popular Posts

Chiropractic Associations

Health Regulation

  • Chiropractic Regulator in UK These are the people who regulate chiropractic in the UK
  • CHRE The Council for Health Care and Regulatory Excelence are the quango set up by the Department of Health to “insure” regulators are fullfilling their statutory duty. They seem to meerly rubber stamp information given to them by the regulators and would not
  • General Medical Council Regulates Medical Doctors in the UK
  • Health Professionals Council Because of the diversity of chiropractic practise, I have always believed the chiropractic profession would have been better off being regulated by thei body where the interests of individual chiropractic groups would have been less important
  • Osteopath Regulation in the UK Set up the rear before the chiropractic profession. Do not seem to have the divisions the GCC and seem to balance their statutory duty with the interests of the Osteopath profession

Skeptics

Unorthodox Health Promotion