GCC sceptics redefining Chiropractic in the UK.

February 1, 2010
By

The GCC are embracing the sceptic view of chiropractic. The only question is whether the UK chiropractic profession continue to roll over and pay the GCC to dismantle the chiropractic profession in the UK. I have no sympathy with the BCA in their efforts to sue Simon Singh but you have to wonder about the GCC’s decision to publish their report  denouncing the effectiveness of chiropractic in helping children as the High Court judges began their deliberations the day after the hearing. I have said many times absence of scientific evidence  is not evidence that chiropractic does not work or that there is not “jot of evidence” It means that the chiropractic researchers have not been able to demonstrate in trials, what many chiropractors observe in practice on a regular basis.

coats-on-sun The GCC have also removed the explanation of a “vertebral subluxation” from their website. Having fought hard to have it included in the GCC FAQs, the only surprise is that its taken Margaret Coats so long to have it removed.  Whether people like the term “subluxation” or not, it is much used by registered chiropractors (it defines the chiropractic lesion) and the public should have an explanation even if it is the sceptic version, avoiding the issue does nothing. I would love to know how the GCC arrived at this decision? is it that people now understand what a subluxation is and have stopped asking the question or the GCC does not want to offend the sceptic community by answering the question? These decisions will only add to the confusion of patients who visit registered chiropractors and have their subluxations corrected.

Reading the GCC’s explanation of chiropractic care its hardly surprising sceptics do not understand why chiropractic could help Colic, Otis media, Asthma etc etc.

Revised GCC information Leaflet about chiropractic. What can I expect when I see a chiropractor.Vote-NO

What is chiropractic treatment?
Chiropractors are concerned with the framework
of bones and muscles that support the body (the
‘musculoskeletal system’). Some problems of the
musculoskeletal system can be caused by accidents,
stress, lack of exercise, poor posture, illness and
everyday wear and tear. These problems may cause
pressure on the nerves in the body.
Depending on your condition, the chiropractor
may manipulate parts of your spine or joints and
give you advice on exercise, self-help, diet and
lifestyle. Some chiropractors also offer rehabilitation
programmes.
Manipulation involves precisely handling or moving
joints, or parts of the spine, sometimes moving them
further than they would normally move.

Related posts:

  1. Sceptics are making complaints
  2. Subluxation Chiropractors must make sure there is not a grain of truth in allegations being made by sceptics
  3. Nice guidelines for back pain draw criticism from sceptics
  4. The McTimoney Chiropractic Association would seem to believe that chiropractic is “bogus”. Posted June 2009
  5. GCC amend the Chiropractic Act to keep their coffers full.
  6. Business as usual; declares General Chiropractic Council chairman Peter Dixon as he rearranges the deckchairs.
  7. Chiropractor Jonathan Clarke has the courage of his convictions and evidence supporting chiropractic.
  8. Former General Chiropractic Council member, Dana Greens letter to new council members in December 2007. “GCC is not fit for purpose”

Tags: ,

My Tweets

  • @Blue_Wode I see you have been busy last few days,Guardian, Telegraph, I make a living from chiropractic & dont spend as much time on it asU Time ago 3 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode movement is vital for wellbeing how people get their bodies moving is up to them.Some people dont like exercise,its not risk free Time ago 3 Days via Twitter
  • RT @DrEvanHarris: @bengoldacre after all if we criticise a cleric/journalist 4 their views - & we do - we wld reject complnts of bei ... Time ago 5 Days via Twitter
  • Isabelle plantation Richmond park one of most beautiful places in May t.co/5QXVXBYv Time ago 5 Days via Photos on iOS
  • @bengoldacre RCTs suggest that an average person should respond in an average way to an intervention. Tail of bell curve for clinicians Time ago 6 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode @Oscap_ @youtube Thats photoshop Time ago 6 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode some do (catholics) and you believe chiropractors use a form of faith healing, some do, majority dont, we use anatomy &physiology Time ago 7 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode fair enough, lots of christian MDs,surely believing, loving god will get you into heaven, is more odd than anything I believe in Time ago 7 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode thats like me making judgement about you because "skepticalhealh" made idiotic comments to me. Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode I focus on correcting spinal dysfunction and if they have medical conditions, I send them to their GPs for medical treatment Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode well taught at AECC, would love to compare my knowledge of differential diagnosis for spinal conditions with any medical doc Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode This is the point I am making to you, pathology and differential diagnosis are for the practice of medicine not chiropractic Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode the S word is not used at AECC, a very medicalised education,which I strongly opposed,however compares favourably with med school Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @Blue_Wode something for your website my tutors in these subjects all had medical backgrounds t.co/sw5Tgsh4 Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • @bengoldacre @SLSingh shows how little you know about chiropractic profession& politics in general if you think Joe Blogs hs much influence Time ago 8 Days via Twitter
  • Powered by: Web Design Company

Follow @richardlanigan on twitter.

Topics related to the Art, Science, Philosophy & Promotion of Chiropractic

SafeSubscribe with Constant Contact
For Email Newsletters you can trust
Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: